We
spoke in class of how the Harry Potter series melds various well-known genres
to produce stories that are at once familiar and unfamiliar. In other words, we recognize certain generic
conventions, but also can appreciate how Rowling is putting her own spin on them. For this first blog post, we’d like you to
analyze your own response to books 1 and 2 of the series, and how that response
is shaped by Rowling’s use and revision of generic conventions. What particularly appeals to you about books
1 and 2, and how is this appeal related
to Rowling’s use of generic conventions? An example: you could speak of how your response to books
1 and 2 is influenced by Rowling’s integration into the story of both the
mystery and fantasy genres.
Note
that you should limit your discussion of genre to one or two specific types;
don’t try to tackle every genre you can find alluded to in the books. Instead, choose the one or two most important
to shaping your response to books 1 and 2.
You can review the handout “The Genres of Harry Potter” under “Course
Documents” if this helps refresh your memory of our discussion on days 1 and 2.
A
last instruction (don’t worry; our blog prompts won’t typically be this
long!): be as specific as possible in
citing examples from books 1 and 2 to illustrate your points. Quote and/or cite specific details—and specif
references to your response to the books. Oh, and please no spoilers in your
post beyond the first two books.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.